Blog
BlogAugust 9, 2020

Liability for an official crime under Art. 231 of the Criminal Code – a detailed analysis

A detailed analysis of liability for the crime of abuse of authority by a public official under Art. 231 of the Criminal Code. What are the elements of the offense and how is it applied in practice?

Art. 231 of the Criminal Code is one of the most important and at the same time most controversial provisions of Polish criminal law. It penalizes a public official who, by exceeding their authority or failing to perform their duty, acts to the detriment of the public or private interest.

Elements of the offense:

  • Subject – only a public official (funktionariusz publiczny) as defined in Art. 115 §13 of the Criminal Code. This includes, among others, judges, prosecutors, police officers, local government officials, and employees of government agencies.
  • Act – exceeding authority (acting beyond one’s competence) or failing to perform a duty (omission of a required action).
  • Result – acting to the detriment of public or private interest. The harm does not need to materialize – the creation of danger to the interest is sufficient.
  • Intent – the perpetrator must act intentionally, at minimum with indirect intent (dolus eventualis).

Common prosecution errors:

In my practice, I frequently encounter cases where Art. 231 is applied too broadly. Prosecutors tend to conflate procedural irregularities with criminal conduct, forgetting that not every breach of duty constitutes a crime. The key distinguishing factor is the element of intent and the direction of the action toward harming a specific interest.

Paweł Osiński

Attorney specializing in white-collar criminal law

First consultation

A free initial phone call will help determine the scope of legal assistance needed.

Book a meeting